
The Academy Awards Ceremony is this Sunday (ironically this year only a few days after Wien's own red-carpet ceremony, the
Opernball). Everyone has been blogging about the
nominations, their favorites, and their speculations. See
A.O. Scott or
David Carr "The Carpetbagger" for more details. In regards to the top award, the nominees are as follows:
Best Motion Picture:“The Curious Case of Benjamin Button” (Paramount and Warner Bros.)
“Frost/Nixon” (Universal)
“Milk” (Focus Features)
“The Reader” (The Weinstein Company)
“Slumdog Millionaire” (Fox Searchlight)
I have not yet seen
"Frost/Nixon" or
"The Reader", though I have heard great reactions to both.
"Milk" was phenomenal, and I would be content if they snagged the top prize. Sean Penn's performance certainly deserves an Oscar for Best Actor.
But I admit, I was rather surprised to see
"Benjamin Button" receiving a top nod. Don't get me wrong, it was a very nice movie, but I left the theater with the feeling that it had all been done before. Funny or Die captures my sentiments best:
The Curious Case of Forrest Gump (Thanks for this link,
Kodachrome Quixote!). Also, I was not very impressed with Brad Pitt. And it was a bit too long and not at all related to the Fitzgerald short story. All in all, it wasn't a bad movie, but Best Picture caliber? Really?! And with 13 nods, being offered the most nominations?!
I admit, along with most of the Hollywood community, I am enamored with
Slumdog Millionaire. There's been a decent amount of controversy in India surrounding this film (
here,
here, and
here for example), especially because of its use of the derogatory "slumdog" in the title and its portrayal of slum life. Today's
NYT featured opinion piece provide fascinating insights into Dharavi, the "slum" near Mumbai that was used in the filming. According to their editorial, Dharavi is a safe, resourceful, and incredibly industrious city. Others are offended by the slang of "dog", but as
Chitra Divakaruni points out, most of those employing this critique have probably not seen the movie. "Slumdog" is never a term used to refer to all the slum dwellers, but instead only spoken in specific instances by characters who play an antagonistic role opposite our hero, Jamal. Others feel that the movie heaped on too much of the extremes, including everything possibly bad and horrific to be solved by a material goal--in the words of
Jamie Rhein, piling "on bad news in huge helpings with only one solution to address the mess--win gobs of money and get the girl."
These are all valid critiques, and yet I still strongly support "Slumdog Millionaire" for Best Picture. Unlike every other film on the list as far as I am aware, "Slumdog Millionaire" takes us to a world that would be unfamiliar to most everyday American viewers. There are no big-name American stars or faces that we recognize, yet we are drawn into this story and relate with the characters. This is not a documentary, and of course it is not entirely factual--the extremes must be taken with a grain of salt. Yet it is a beautifully painted fairy tale and might serve in a small way to push everyday viewers beyond their comfort zone, to gain a glimpse of a beautiful and unfamiliar culture that is different from their own, and yet the same so many ways.